MediaTek MT8735W vs MediaTek MT6580P

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8735W vs MediaTek MT6580P, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8735W is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6580P is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as PassMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Octane V2, 3DMark, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MT8735W or MT6580P and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8735W

MT6580P

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8735W

26%

MT6580P

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8735W

MT6580P

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8735W	MT6580P
Total score	23460	20298
CPU	6565	5679
GPU	8914	7718
MEM	3746	3247
UX	4222	3656

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8735W	MT6580P
Single-Core	62	53
Multi-Core	286	248

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8735W	MT6580P
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	4 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	17	8.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	4.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.9	15.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	11.7	9.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.5	7.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.1	11.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	22.1	19.3
Real Racing 3	14.6	13.7
Sniper 3D	25.7	14.6
Need for Speed No Limits	18.7	10.9
Mortal Kombat X	17	10.5
CSR Racing 2	15.2	11.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735W is better: 28
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580P is better: 0
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT8735W and MT6580P, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8735W SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8735W specs and review.

MT6580P SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6580P specs and review.