Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT8735W vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT8735W vs HiSilicon Kirin 620

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8735W vs HiSilicon Kirin 620, compare of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T720 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8735W is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Quadrant, Geekbench, Octane V2, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT8735W or Kirin 620 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
MediaTek MT8735W
HiSilicon Kirin 620

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT8735W1% Kirin 6202%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT8735W26% Kirin 62024%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT8735W1% Kirin 6201%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT8735W Kirin 620
Total score2346033885
CPU65659480
GPU891412867
MEM37465430
UX42226089

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT8735W Kirin 620
Single-Core6290
Multi-Core286414

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT8735W Kirin 620
Frequency1300 MHz1200 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A538x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3x
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency800800
Memory bandwidth428
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache1 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8735W is 7% better than Kirin 620 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8735W has 4 more core than Kirin 620. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720 MP2Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency500 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS1729.81
# of Cores24
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.711.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)17.928.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra11.719.1
Call of Duty: Mobile10.517.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)14.123.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition22.135.4
Real Racing 314.638.2
Sniper 3D25.724.8
Need for Speed No Limits18.722.9
Mortal Kombat X1724.8
CSR Racing 215.224.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735W is better: 3
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 28
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT8735W and Kirin 620, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8735W SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT8735W SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


Kirin 620 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands