|
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i9-12900H and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Prime95, 7zip, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, SuperPi, Furmark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900H or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i9-12900H | 66% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900H is 10% better than Core i9-13900H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i9-12900H | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.4 | 100.8 | Valorant | 117.5 | 114.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 64.1 | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 107.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 85.9 | Overwatch | 95.2 | 92.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 79.0 | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 57.3 | Warzone | 91.6 | 89.3 | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 96.2 | Valheim | 97.5 | 95.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i9-12900H | 143% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-12900H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 484 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 5097 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 808 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 11333 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 2866 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 32614 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-12900H | Single-Core | 1545 | 7469 | Multi-Core | 32177 | 55757 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-12900H | Single-Core | 1884 | 1935 | Multi-Core | 15080 | 12544 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-12900H | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 14 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 108 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 7% better than Core i9-12900H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900H is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i9-12900H before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-12900H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|