|
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Apple M2 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Apple M2 Pro and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Handbrake, AIDA64, 7zip, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13505H | 57% |
M2 Pro | 61% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 6% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13505H | 56% |
M2 Pro | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.1 | 104.8 | Valorant | 112.6 | 119.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 66.7 | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 111.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 89.3 | Overwatch | 91.2 | 96.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 82.2 | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 59.5 | Warzone | 87.8 | 92.9 | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 100.0 | Valheim | 93.5 | 98.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13505H | 124% |
M2 Pro | 496% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13505H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 14W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 366 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 2078 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 714 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 3555 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 2063 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 16023 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1202 | 6111 | Multi-Core | 24847 | 39485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1684 | 2085 | Multi-Core | 10878 | 16467 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Pro | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 12 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 14 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 36MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 0% better than M2 Pro in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 24 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Apple M2 Pro before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|