|
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Apple M2 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Apple M2 Pro and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, 7zip, RealBench, Prime95, SuperPi, Gears 5, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400T | 58% |
M2 Pro | 61% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 4% better than Core i5-13400T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400T | 56% |
M2 Pro | 59% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 104.8 | Valorant | 113.0 | 119.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 66.7 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 111.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 89.3 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 96.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 82.2 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 59.5 | Warzone | 88.2 | 92.9 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 100.0 | Valheim | 93.8 | 98.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400T | 160% |
M2 Pro | 496% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 14W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 366 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 2078 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 714 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 3555 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 2063 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 16023 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1380 | 6111 | Multi-Core | 28855 | 39485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1680 | 2085 | Multi-Core | 11233 | 16467 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Pro | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 10 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 14 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 36MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Pro is 14% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Pro has 2 more core than Core i5-13400T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 27 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and Apple M2 Pro before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|