|
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i5-13505H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i5-13505H and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13505H or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i5-13505H | 57% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 3% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i5-13505H | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 99.1 | Valorant | 117.7 | 112.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 63.1 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 105.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 84.5 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 91.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 77.7 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 56.3 | Warzone | 91.8 | 87.8 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 94.6 | Valheim | 97.7 | 93.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i5-13505H | 124% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13505H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-13505H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 248 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 2308 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 394 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 5092 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1312 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 14590 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-13505H | Single-Core | 1564 | 1202 | Multi-Core | 32503 | 24847 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-13505H | Single-Core | 1907 | 1684 | Multi-Core | 15235 | 10878 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-13505H | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | January 14, 2023 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1792 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 14 | 12 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 18 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 14% better than Core i5-13505H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13905H has 2 more core than Core i5-13505H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 0 However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i5-13505H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
| |
|