|
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-12900KS and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Handbrake, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900KS or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i9-12900KS | 73% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KS is 21% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i9-12900KS | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.1 | 108.6 | Valorant | 112.6 | 123.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 69.1 | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 116.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 91.2 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 85.1 | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 61.7 | Warzone | 87.8 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 103.7 | Valheim | 93.5 | 102.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i9-12900KS | 48% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13505H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KS since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 150W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 669 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 6984 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 1113 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 15520 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 3930 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 44652 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Single-Core | 1202 | 4211 | Multi-Core | 24847 | 76561 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Single-Core | 1684 | 2187 | Multi-Core | 10878 | 20189 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | March 27, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 5.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4 MHz | Cores | 12 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 150 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KS is 12% better than Core i5-13505H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900KS has 4 more core than Core i5-13505H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KS is better: 30 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i9-12900KS before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-12900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|