|
Intel Core i5-13600H vs Apple M2 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13600H vs Apple M2 Pro and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, 3DMark, Blender, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, PassMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i5-13600H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600H | 58% |
M2 Pro | 61% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 4% better than Core i5-13600H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600H | 56% |
M2 Pro | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.1 | 104.8 | Valorant | 113.8 | 119.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.7 | 66.7 | Apex Legends | 106.9 | 111.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.3 | 89.3 | Overwatch | 92.2 | 96.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.5 | 82.2 | DOOM Eternal | 56.9 | 59.5 | Warzone | 88.7 | 92.9 | Assassin's Creed | 95.6 | 100.0 | Valheim | 94.4 | 98.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600H | 120% |
M2 Pro | 496% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 14W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600H |
Apple M2 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 260 | 366 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2447 | 2078 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 415 | 714 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5404 | 3555 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1390 | 2063 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15490 | 16023 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600H |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1273 | 6111 | Multi-Core | 28963 | 39485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600H |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1628 | 2085 | Multi-Core | 11883 | 16467 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600H |
Apple M2 Pro | Announcement date | January 23, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 12 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 14 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 36MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600H is 3% better than M2 Pro in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600H is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 24 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600H and Apple M2 Pro before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|