 |
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i5-1250P |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i5-1250P and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip, AIDA64, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Furmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, MATLAB, Blender, VeraCrypt, WPrime.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-1250P or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i5-1250P | 56% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13505H is 1% better than Core i5-1250P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i5-1250P | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 97.1 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 110.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 61.8 | | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 103.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 82.8 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 89.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 76.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 55.2 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 86.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 92.7 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 91.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i5-1250P | 189% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1250P is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13505H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 28W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-1250P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 272 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 1991 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 653 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 4521 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 1527 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 14904 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-1250P | | Single-Core | 1202 | 3574 | | Multi-Core | 24847 | 20866 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-1250P | | Single-Core | 1684 | 1595 | | Multi-Core | 10878 | 8965 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-1250P | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-P | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 1.7 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 28 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 6 MB | | | L3 cache | 18 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 51% better than Core i5-1250P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1250P is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i5-1250P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i5-1250P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
