 |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i5-13505H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i5-13505H and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, 3DMark, PassMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Blender, UserBenchmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Handbrake, 7zip, AIDA64, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13505H or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Core i5-13505H | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13505H is 5% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Core i5-13505H | 56% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Control, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 99.1 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 112.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 63.1 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 105.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 84.5 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 91.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 77.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 56.3 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 87.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 94.6 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 93.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Core i5-13505H | 124% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13505H as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i5-13505H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 248 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 2308 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 394 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 5092 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1312 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 14590 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i5-13505H | | Single-Core | 2510 | 1202 | | Multi-Core | 15340 | 24847 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i5-13505H | | Single-Core | 1047 | 1684 | | Multi-Core | 4058 | 10878 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i5-13505H | | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | January 14, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1792 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 12 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 6 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 50% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13505H has 4 more core than Core i3-N300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 28
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Core i5-13505H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
|
|
|
