 |
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Apple M2 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Apple M2 Max and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like UserBenchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, MATLAB, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13505H | 57% |
M2 Max | 62% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 8% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13505H | 56% |
M2 Max | 60% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 106.0 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 120.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 67.4 | | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 113.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 90.3 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 97.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 83.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 60.2 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 93.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 101.2 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 99.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13505H | 124% |
M2 Max | 465% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13505H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Max | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 389 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 2220 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 761 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 3801 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 2204 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 17142 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Max | | Single-Core | 1202 | 6536 | | Multi-Core | 24847 | 42246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Max | | Single-Core | 1684 | 2096 | | Multi-Core | 10878 | 17617 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Apple M2 Max | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop;Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | M2 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | | Generation | 13 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.49 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 412 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | | L3 cache | 18 MB | 48MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 0% better than M2 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Apple M2 Max before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-1345U
|
|
|
