|
Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|
Processor comparisons 22-10-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Prime95, MATLAB, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Blender, Handbrake, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, 7zip, Blender, UserBenchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS or Apple M2 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 Pro | 61% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 57% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 6% better than Ryzen 5 6600HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 Pro | 59% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.8 | 96.3 | Valorant | 119.1 | 109.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.7 | 61.3 | Apex Legends | 111.9 | 102.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.3 | 82.1 | Overwatch | 96.5 | 88.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.2 | 75.5 | DOOM Eternal | 59.5 | 54.7 | Warzone | 92.9 | 85.4 | Assassin's Creed | 100.0 | 91.9 | Valheim | 98.8 | 90.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 Pro | 496% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 139% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 6600HS since it has less power consumption: 14W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 Pro |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 366 | 228 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2078 | 2261 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 714 | 540 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3555 | 4963 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2063 | 1405 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16023 | 12636 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | Single-Core | 6111 | 3016 | Multi-Core | 39485 | 24991 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | Single-Core | 2085 | 1464 | Multi-Core | 16467 | 8133 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Apple M2 Pro |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | Announcement date | October 20, 2022 | January 09, 2022 | Type | Desktop;Laptop | Laptop | Socket | M2 | FP7 | Core name | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Rembrandt | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 3+ | Generation | 2 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 12 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 14 W | 35 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 24MB | 3MB | L3 cache | 36MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | FP7:100-000000546 FP7r2:100-000000562
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Pro is 5% better than Ryzen 5 6600HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Pro has 6 more core than Ryzen 5 6600HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M2 Pro and AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
| |
|