 |
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-12900HX |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-12900HX and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, WPrime, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Furmark, Blender, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Blender, Prime95, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900HX or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i9-12900HX | 69% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900HX is 17% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i9-12900HX | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.1 | 104.5 | Valorant | 112.6 | 118.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 66.5 | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 111.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 89.1 | Overwatch | 91.2 | 96.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 82.0 | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 59.4 | Warzone | 87.8 | 92.6 | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 99.8 | Valheim | 93.5 | 98.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i9-12900HX | 118% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13505H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900HX as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 55W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900HX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 560 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 5904 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 936 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 13128 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 3320 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 37780 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900HX | Single-Core | 1202 | 3557 | Multi-Core | 24847 | 64783 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900HX | Single-Core | 1684 | 1947 | Multi-Core | 10878 | 16198 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-12900HX | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | June 26, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1964 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 12 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 55 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900HX is 2% better than Core i5-13505H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900HX has 4 more core than Core i5-13505H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900HX is better: 29 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i9-12900HX before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-12900HX Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H
| |
|