 |
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-9980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-9980HK and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as UserBenchmark, AIDA64, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, 3DMark, Prime95, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, 7zip, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi.
And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9980HK or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i9-9980HK | 54% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13505H is 5% better than Core i9-9980HK. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i9-9980HK | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 95.7 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 108.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 60.9 | | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 102.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 88.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 75.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 84.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 90.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i9-9980HK | 86% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13505H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9980HK since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 196 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 1607 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 485 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 3503 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 1186 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 8370 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Single-Core | 1202 | 2657 | | Multi-Core | 24847 | 15065 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Single-Core | 1684 | 1165 | | Multi-Core | 10878 | 7554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 6 MB | | | L3 cache | 18 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 31% better than Core i9-9980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13505H has 4 more core than Core i9-9980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9980HK is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i9-9980HK before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-9980HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
