|
Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i9-11980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 22-10-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i9-11980HK and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, WPrime, PCMark 10, Blender, Blender, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Prime95, Gears 5, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11980HK or Apple M2 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 Pro | 61% |
Core i9-11980HK | 58% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 4% better than Core i9-11980HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 Pro | 59% |
Core i9-11980HK | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.8 | 98.4 | Valorant | 119.1 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.7 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 111.9 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.3 | 83.9 | Overwatch | 96.5 | 90.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.2 | 77.2 | DOOM Eternal | 59.5 | 55.9 | Warzone | 92.9 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 100.0 | 93.9 | Valheim | 98.8 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 Pro | 496% |
Core i9-11980HK | 82% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i9-11980HK since it has less power consumption: 14W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 366 | 298 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2078 | 2704 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 714 | 668 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3555 | 6009 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2063 | 1735 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16023 | 17294 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 6111 | 3989 | Multi-Core | 39485 | 29565 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 2085 | 1599 | Multi-Core | 16467 | 10219 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Announcement date | October 20, 2022 | February 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop;Laptop | Laptop | Socket | M2 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Tiger Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 2 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 12 | 8 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 14 W | 65 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 24MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 36MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Pro is 5% better than Core i9-11980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Pro has 4 more core than Core i9-11980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11980HK is better: 10 However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M2 Pro and Intel Core i9-11980HK before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Core i9-11980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|