|
Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i9-11900H |
|
Processor comparisons 22-10-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i9-11900H and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, Handbrake, Prime95, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, 3DMark, UserBenchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11900H or Apple M2 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 Pro | 61% |
Core i9-11900H | 58% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 4% better than Core i9-11900H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 Pro | 59% |
Core i9-11900H | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.8 | 98.3 | Valorant | 119.1 | 111.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.7 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 111.9 | 105.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.3 | 83.8 | Overwatch | 96.5 | 90.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.2 | 77.1 | DOOM Eternal | 59.5 | 55.9 | Warzone | 92.9 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 100.0 | 93.9 | Valheim | 98.8 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 Pro | 496% |
Core i9-11900H | 45% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i9-11900H as it consumes less power: 14W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11900H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 366 | 293 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2078 | 2652 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 714 | 655 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3555 | 5897 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2063 | 1703 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16023 | 16969 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11900H | Single-Core | 6111 | 3915 | Multi-Core | 39485 | 29011 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11900H | Single-Core | 2085 | 1705 | Multi-Core | 16467 | 10136 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M2 Pro |
Intel Core i9-11900H | Announcement date | October 20, 2022 | February 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop;Laptop | Laptop | Socket | M2 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Tiger Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 2 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 12 | 8 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 14 W | 125 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 24MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 36MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-11900H is 0% better than M2 Pro in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Pro has 4 more core than Core i9-11900H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11900H is better: 11 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Apple M2 Pro and Intel Core i9-11900H before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Core i9-11900H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|