|
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i5-13500 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i5-13500 and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, MATLAB, SuperPi, WPrime, Prime95, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PassMark, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Gears 5, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13500 or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i5-13500 | 61% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500 is 6% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i5-13500 | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.1 | 104.0 | Valorant | 112.6 | 118.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 66.2 | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 111.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 88.6 | Overwatch | 91.2 | 95.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 81.6 | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 59.1 | Warzone | 87.8 | 92.2 | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 99.3 | Valheim | 93.5 | 98.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i5-13500 | 94% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13505H is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 336 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 3353 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 549 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 7434 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 1895 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 21360 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Single-Core | 1202 | 1732 | Multi-Core | 24847 | 36394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Single-Core | 1684 | 1846 | Multi-Core | 10878 | 15694 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | September 23, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 12 | 14 | Threads | 16 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 68 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13505H is 28% better than Core i5-13500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500 has 2 more core than Core i5-13505H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500 is better: 27 Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i5-13500 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i5-13500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|