 |
Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, AIDA64, Blender, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, WPrime, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Gears 5, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, PassMark, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 2500X or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 10% better than Ryzen 5 2500X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.5 | 92.3 | | Valorant | 113.0 | 104.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 58.7 | | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 98.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 78.7 | | Overwatch | 91.5 | 85.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 72.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 52.5 | | Warzone | 88.2 | 81.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 88.1 | | Valheim | 93.8 | 87.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Ryzen 5 2500X | 56% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 2500X since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 148 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 754 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 377 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 1620 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 1028 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 4738 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | | Single-Core | 1380 | 2312 | | Multi-Core | 28855 | 9540 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | | Single-Core | 1680 | 1092 | | Multi-Core | 11233 | 4231 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | September 10, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Pinnacle Ridge | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 13 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 4 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 3600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD250XBBM4KAF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 2500X is 16% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400T has 6 more core than Ryzen 5 2500X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is better: 6
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400T and AMD Ryzen 5 2500X before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
|
|
|
