|
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-6900K |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-6900K and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like 7zip, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Handbrake, WPrime, Blender, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Gears 5, Blender, 3DMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6900K or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Core i7-6900K | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 6% better than Core i7-6900K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Core i7-6900K | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 97.2 | Valorant | 113.0 | 110.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 61.8 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 103.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 82.8 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 89.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 76.2 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 55.2 | Warzone | 88.2 | 86.1 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 92.7 | Valheim | 93.8 | 91.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Core i7-6900K | 24% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6900K since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 140W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-6900K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 207 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 1439 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 484 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 3668 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 1151 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 11326 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-6900K | Single-Core | 1380 | 2405 | Multi-Core | 28855 | 13871 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-6900K | Single-Core | 1680 | 1016 | Multi-Core | 11233 | 8971 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-6900K | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | April 01, 2016 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA2011-3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Broadwell E | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 10 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 140 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 2400/2133 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6900K is 6% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400T has 2 more core than Core i7-6900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6900K is better: 3 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and Intel Core i7-6900K before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i7-6900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| |
|