 |
Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like UserBenchmark, 3DMark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, 7zip, Gears 5, AIDA64, PassMark, Furmark, MATLAB, Handbrake, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 3500 or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Ryzen 5 3500 | 53% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 8% better than Ryzen 5 3500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Ryzen 5 3500 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.5 | 94.7 | | Valorant | 113.0 | 107.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 60.3 | | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 101.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 80.7 | | Overwatch | 91.5 | 87.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 74.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 53.8 | | Warzone | 88.2 | 83.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 90.4 | | Valheim | 93.8 | 89.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Ryzen 5 3500 | 276% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 3500 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 188 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 1129 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 464 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 2652 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 995 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 7015 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 | | Single-Core | 1380 | 2504 | | Multi-Core | 28855 | 12878 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 | | Single-Core | 1680 | 1245 | | Multi-Core | 11233 | 6579 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | February 18, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FP5 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Matisse | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 13 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.1 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 4 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 4200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 15 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM3500C4T4MFG
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13400T is 29% better than Ryzen 5 3500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400T has 6 more core than Ryzen 5 3500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500 is better: 6
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and AMD Ryzen 5 3500 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
|
|
|
