|
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Apple M2 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Apple M2 Max and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, MATLAB, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender, AIDA64, RealBench, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400T | 58% |
M2 Max | 62% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 6% better than Core i5-13400T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400T | 56% |
M2 Max | 60% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 106.0 | Valorant | 113.0 | 120.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 67.4 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 113.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 90.3 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 97.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 83.1 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 60.2 | Warzone | 88.2 | 93.9 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 101.2 | Valheim | 93.8 | 99.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400T | 160% |
M2 Max | 465% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Max | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 389 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 2220 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 761 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 3801 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 2204 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 17142 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1380 | 6536 | Multi-Core | 28855 | 42246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1680 | 2096 | Multi-Core | 11233 | 17617 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Apple M2 Max | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 10 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 412 GByte/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 48MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Max is 14% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Max has 2 more core than Core i5-13400T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 28 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400T and Apple M2 Max before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|