|
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i5-13400 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i5-13400 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, VeraCrypt, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13400 or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Core i5-13400 | 59% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400 is 1% better than Core i5-13400T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Core i5-13400 | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 100.3 | Valorant | 113.0 | 114.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 63.8 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 107.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 85.5 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 92.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 78.6 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 57.0 | Warzone | 88.2 | 88.9 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 95.7 | Valheim | 93.8 | 94.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Core i5-13400 | 91% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 276 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 2844 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 457 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 6319 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 1603 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 18171 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 1380 | 1465 | Multi-Core | 28855 | 30969 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 1680 | 1786 | Multi-Core | 11233 | 12045 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | September 23, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 10 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13400T is 16% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 22 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and Intel Core i5-13400 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|