 |
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i9-10900 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i9-10900 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PCMark 10, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, 3DMark, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, 7zip, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900 or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 3% better than Core i9-10900. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.5 | 99.0 | | Valorant | 113.0 | 112.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 63.0 | | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 105.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 84.4 | | Overwatch | 91.5 | 91.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 77.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 56.2 | | Warzone | 88.2 | 87.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 94.5 | | Valheim | 93.8 | 93.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Core i9-10900 | 64% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 231 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 2541 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 529 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 6378 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 1367 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 14816 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Single-Core | 1380 | 3126 | | Multi-Core | 28855 | 21216 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Single-Core | 1680 | 1265 | | Multi-Core | 11233 | 10761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 5.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 10 | | Threads | 16 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13400T is 6% better than Core i9-10900 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900 is better: 6
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and Intel Core i9-10900 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i9-10900 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
|
|
|
