 |
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-11700T |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-11700T tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Prime95, RealBench, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, WPrime, 7zip, Handbrake, SuperPi, Furmark, MATLAB, PassMark, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11700T or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Core i7-11700T | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 1% better than Core i7-11700T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Core i7-11700T | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.5 | 97.0 | | Valorant | 113.0 | 110.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 61.8 | | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 103.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 82.7 | | Overwatch | 91.5 | 89.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 76.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 55.1 | | Warzone | 88.2 | 86.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 92.6 | | Valheim | 93.8 | 91.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Core i7-11700T | 153% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-11700T as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-11700T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 239 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 2285 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 558 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 5121 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 1455 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 13552 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-11700T | | Single-Core | 1380 | 3247 | | Multi-Core | 28855 | 24722 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-11700T | | Single-Core | 1680 | 1614 | | Multi-Core | 11233 | 8864 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-11700T | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 1.4 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 50 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13400T is 53% better than Core i7-11700T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400T has 2 more core than Core i7-11700T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11700T is better: 5
However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400T and Intel Core i7-11700T before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i7-11700T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
|
|
|
