 |
Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like WPrime, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 1600X or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 53% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400T is 8% better than Ryzen 5 1600X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.5 | 93.8 | | Valorant | 113.0 | 106.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 59.7 | | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 100.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 80.0 | | Overwatch | 91.5 | 86.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 73.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 53.3 | | Warzone | 88.2 | 83.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 89.6 | | Valheim | 93.8 | 88.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 35% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 1600X as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 151 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 1126 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 389 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 2764 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 942 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 6470 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | | Single-Core | 1380 | 2217 | | Multi-Core | 28855 | 13041 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | | Single-Core | 1680 | 1010 | | Multi-Core | 11233 | 5730 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | April 11, 2017 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Summit Ridge | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 13 | 1 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 6 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 2800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 95 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 576KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 3MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD160XBCM6IAE
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 1600X is 16% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400T has 4 more core than Ryzen 5 1600X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400T and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
