 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-10870H |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-10870H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, AIDA64, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, PCMark 10, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10870H or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 56% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825C is 3% better than Core i7-10870H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 5825C | 53% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.8 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 107.8 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 102.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 87.3 | 88.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 54.5 | | Warzone | 84.1 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 89.4 | 90.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 288% |
Core i7-10870H | 94% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 5825C is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10870H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 208 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 1522 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 499 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 3457 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 1167 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 11396 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 2603 | 2734 | | Multi-Core | 21502 | 15954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 1300 | 1271 | | Multi-Core | 6695 | 7816 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Barcelo | Comet Lake | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-10870H is 9% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10870H is better: 21
Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and Intel Core i7-10870H before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i7-10870H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
