 |
Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i7-10870H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i7-10870H tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 7zip, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, Blender, Prime95, WPrime, AIDA64, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Valorant
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10870H or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 5% better than Core i7-10870H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 102.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 87.5 | 88.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.5 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 90.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Core i7-10870H | 94% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10870H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 208 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 1522 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 499 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 3457 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1167 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 11396 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 1182 | 2734 | | Multi-Core | 24951 | 15954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 1663 | 1271 | | Multi-Core | 6952 | 7816 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 8 | | Threads | 6 | 16 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 33% better than Core i7-10870H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10870H has 3 more core than Core i3-1305U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10870H is better: 21
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-1305U and Intel Core i7-10870H before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-10870H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
