|
Intel Core i3-1315U vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-1315U vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Prime95, 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, SuperPi, 7zip, PCMark 10, Gears 5. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Core i3-1315U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1315U | 58% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1315U is 12% better than Athlon PRO 300U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1315U | 54% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.7 | 90.0 | Valorant | 108.7 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 102.2 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 88.1 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.0 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 51.1 | Warzone | 84.8 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 91.3 | 85.9 | Valheim | 90.2 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1315U | 400% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1315U is more energy efficient than the Athlon PRO 300U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 243 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2487 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 403 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5520 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1404 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15866 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1282 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 27041 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1803 | 746 | Multi-Core | 7535 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | January 20, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP5 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 6 | 2 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1MB | L3 cache | 10 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1315U is 27% better than Athlon PRO 300U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-1315U has 4 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1315U is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 3 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1315U and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1315U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|