 |
Intel Core i3-1315U vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-1315U vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, 7zip, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, RealBench, PassMark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS or Intel Core i3-1315U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1315U | 58% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 57% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1315U is 1% better than Ryzen 5 6600HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1315U | 54% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.7 | 96.3 | | Valorant | 108.7 | 109.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 61.3 | | Apex Legends | 102.2 | 102.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 82.1 | | Overwatch | 88.1 | 88.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.0 | 75.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 84.8 | 85.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.3 | 91.9 | | Valheim | 90.2 | 90.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1315U | 400% |
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 139% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1315U is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 6600HS as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 243 | 228 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2487 | 2261 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 403 | 540 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5520 | 4963 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1404 | 1405 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15866 | 12636 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | | Single-Core | 1282 | 3016 | | Multi-Core | 27041 | 24991 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | | Single-Core | 1803 | 1464 | | Multi-Core | 7535 | 8133 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1315U |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | | Announcement date | January 20, 2023 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rembrandt | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 13 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 3MB | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| FP7:100-000000546 FP7r2:100-000000562
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1315U is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is better: 19
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1315U and AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1315U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
|
|
|
