Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9334 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9334

Processor comparisons   27-03-2023
   If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9334 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like SuperPi, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, Handbrake, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, 7zip, RealBench, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PassMark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Valorant
  • Fallout 76
  • Halo Infinite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Valheim
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Fortnite
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Apex Legends
  • Last Man Standing
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Death Stranding
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or AMD EPYC 7H12.


 
AMD EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 9334

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7H1279% EPYC 933470%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7H12 is 11% better than EPYC 9334. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7H1285% EPYC 933475%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite150.5132.6
Valorant171.1150.7
Cyberpunk 207795.884.4
Apex Legends160.8141.6
Call of Duty Warzone128.3113.0
Overwatch138.6122.0
Red Dead Redemption 2118.0104.0
DOOM Eternal85.575.3
Warzone133.4117.5
Assassin's Creed143.7126.6
Valheim142.0125.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7H1212% EPYC 933435%
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 210W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9334
Cinbench 15 Single-core293156
Cinbench 15 Multi-core122078366
Cinbench 20 Single-core580334
Cinbench 20 Multi-core3024317782
Cinbench 23 Single-core1365896
Cinbench 23 Multi-core6730146317

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9334
Single-Core34422073
Multi-Core9872667962

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9334
Single-Core10252209
Multi-Core6130443703

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9334
Announcement dateApril 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.3 MHz3.9 MHz
Frequency2.6 MHz2.7 MHz
Cores6432
Threads12864
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count86000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)280 W210 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth204.8 GByte/s460.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB128MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000055
100-000000055WOF
100-000000800
100-100000800WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9334 is 3% better than EPYC 7H12 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7H12 has 32 more core than EPYC 9334. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 11
   However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 9334 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7H12 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9334 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands