Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9274F gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9274F

Processor comparisons   27-03-2023
   You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9274F and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, AIDA64, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Blender, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Valorant
  • Overwatch
  • Borderlands 3
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Death Stranding
  • Fallout 76
  • Halo Infinite
  • Fortnite
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valheim
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Last Man Standing
  • Apex Legends

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9274F or AMD EPYC 7H12.


 
AMD EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 9274F

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7H1279% EPYC 9274F69%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7H12 is 12% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7H1285% EPYC 9274F73%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite150.5129.7
Valorant171.1147.4
Cyberpunk 207795.882.5
Apex Legends160.8138.5
Call of Duty Warzone128.3110.5
Overwatch138.6119.4
Red Dead Redemption 2118.0101.7
DOOM Eternal85.573.7
Warzone133.4114.9
Assassin's Creed143.7123.8
Valheim142.0122.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7H1212% EPYC 9274F21%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9274F
Cinbench 15 Single-core293154
Cinbench 15 Multi-core122077827
Cinbench 20 Single-core580321
Cinbench 20 Multi-core3024316627
Cinbench 23 Single-core1365846
Cinbench 23 Multi-core6730143295

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9274F
Single-Core34421946
Multi-Core9872663524

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9274F
Single-Core10252073
Multi-Core6130440852

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9274F
Announcement dateApril 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.3 MHz4.3 MHz
Frequency2.6 MHz4.05 MHz
Cores6424
Threads12848
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count86000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)280 W320 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth204.8 GByte/s460.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000055
100-000000055WOF
100-000000794
100-000000794WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 35% better than EPYC 7H12 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7H12 has 40 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 10
   However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 9274F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7H12 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9274F - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands