 |
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 7542 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 7542 and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as MATLAB, Blender, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, AIDA64, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Prime95, RealBench, Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7542 or AMD EPYC 7H12.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7H12 | 79% |
EPYC 7542 | 67% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7H12 is 15% better than EPYC 7542. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7H12 | 85% |
EPYC 7542 | 76% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 150.5 | 134.8 | | Valorant | 171.1 | 153.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.8 | 85.8 | | Apex Legends | 160.8 | 144.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.3 | 114.9 | | Overwatch | 138.6 | 124.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.0 | 105.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.5 | 76.6 | | Warzone | 133.4 | 119.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 143.7 | 128.7 | | Valheim | 142.0 | 127.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7H12 | 12% |
EPYC 7542 | 16% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7542 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 174 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 12207 | 7016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 580 | 419 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30243 | 14867 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1365 | 789 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 67301 | 38654 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 3442 | 2227 | | Multi-Core | 98726 | 56789 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 1025 | 1098 | | Multi-Core | 61304 | 45863 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 32 | | Threads | 128 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GByte/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000055
100-000000055WOF
| 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 10% better than EPYC 7H12 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7H12 has 32 more core than EPYC 7542. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 5
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 7542 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
