Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9374F gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9374F

Processor comparisons   27-03-2023
   If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9374F and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Gears 5, 7zip, RealBench, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Halo Infinite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Valorant
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Death Stranding
  • Overwatch
  • Valheim
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Fortnite
  • Fallout 76
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Apex Legends
  • Last Man Standing
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Watch Dogs Legion

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9374F or AMD EPYC 7H12.


 
AMD EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 9374F

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7H1279% EPYC 9374F71%
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7H12 is 10% better than EPYC 9374F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7H1285% EPYC 9374F76%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Control, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite150.5134.3
Valorant171.1152.7
Cyberpunk 207795.885.5
Apex Legends160.8143.5
Call of Duty Warzone128.3114.5
Overwatch138.6123.7
Red Dead Redemption 2118.0105.3
DOOM Eternal85.576.3
Warzone133.4119.1
Assassin's Creed143.7128.2
Valheim142.0126.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7H1212% EPYC 9374F24%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 320W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9374F
Cinbench 15 Single-core293184
Cinbench 15 Multi-core122078716
Cinbench 20 Single-core580371
Cinbench 20 Multi-core3024318501
Cinbench 23 Single-core1365954
Cinbench 23 Multi-core6730148156

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9374F
Single-Core34422177
Multi-Core9872670650

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9374F
Single-Core10252319
Multi-Core6130445439

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7H12 AMD EPYC 9374F
Announcement dateApril 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.3 MHz4.3 MHz
Frequency2.6 MHz3.85 MHz
Cores6432
Threads12864
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count86000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)280 W320 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth204.8 GByte/s460.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000055
100-000000055WOF
100-000000792
100-100000792WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 32% better than EPYC 7H12 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7H12 has 32 more core than EPYC 9374F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 10
   However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 9374F before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7H12 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9374F - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands