 |
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9654 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 9654 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, SuperPi, PassMark, AIDA64, RealBench, MATLAB, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Handbrake.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654 or AMD EPYC 7H12.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7H12 | 79% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 20% better than EPYC 7H12. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7H12 | 85% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 150.5 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 171.1 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.8 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 160.8 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.3 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 138.6 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.0 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.5 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 133.4 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 143.7 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 142.0 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7H12 | 12% |
EPYC 9654 | 13% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9654 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 495 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 12207 | 20361 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 580 | 930 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30243 | 43157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1365 | 2281 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 67301 | 112225 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 3442 | 4805 | | Multi-Core | 98726 | 164622 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1025 | 1502 | | Multi-Core | 61304 | 86274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 96 | | Threads | 128 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000055
100-000000055WOF
| 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7H12 is 7% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 32 more core than EPYC 7H12. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 32
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 9654 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
