 |
AMD EPYC 9654 vs AMD EPYC 7343 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9654 vs AMD EPYC 7343 and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, Prime95.
And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7343 or AMD EPYC 9654.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9654 | 99% |
EPYC 7343 | 63% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 36% better than EPYC 7343. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9654 | 99% |
EPYC 7343 | 69% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 176.0 | 123.1 | | Valorant | 200.0 | 139.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 112.0 | 78.3 | | Apex Legends | 188.0 | 131.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 150.0 | 104.9 | | Overwatch | 162.0 | 113.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 138.0 | 96.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 100.0 | 69.9 | | Warzone | 156.0 | 109.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 168.0 | 117.5 | | Valheim | 166.0 | 116.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9654 | 13% |
EPYC 7343 | 24% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7343 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654 as it consumes less power: 360W vs. 190W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9654 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 495 | 133 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 20361 | 5605 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 930 | 251 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 43157 | 11884 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2281 | 624 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 112225 | 30909 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9654 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 4805 | 1409 | | Multi-Core | 164622 | 45341 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9654 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 1502 | 1387 | | Multi-Core | 86274 | 34378 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9654 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 96 | 16 | | Threads | 192 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 116000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 190 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 384MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF | 100-000000338
100-100000338WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7343 is 25% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 80 more core than EPYC 7343. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7343 is better: 3
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD EPYC 7343 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7343 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
