 |
AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 7343 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 7343 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, 7zip, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, 3DMark, Blender, MATLAB.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7343 or AMD EPYC 9254.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9254 | 66% |
EPYC 7343 | 63% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9254 is 4% better than EPYC 7343. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9254 | 70% |
EPYC 7343 | 69% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 124.2 | 123.1 | | Valorant | 141.2 | 139.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 79.1 | 78.3 | | Apex Legends | 132.7 | 131.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 105.9 | 104.9 | | Overwatch | 114.3 | 113.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 97.4 | 96.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 70.6 | 69.9 | | Warzone | 110.1 | 109.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 118.6 | 117.5 | | Valheim | 117.2 | 116.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9254 | 29% |
EPYC 7343 | 24% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9254 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7343 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 190W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 129 | 133 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6801 | 5605 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 274 | 251 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14453 | 11884 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 730 | 624 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37643 | 30909 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 1687 | 1409 | | Multi-Core | 55233 | 45341 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 1797 | 1387 | | Multi-Core | 35518 | 34378 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.15 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 16 | | Threads | 48 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 190 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000480
100-000000480WOF | 100-000000338
100-100000338WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7343 is 9% better than EPYC 9254 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9254 has 8 more core than EPYC 7343. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9254 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7343 is better: 3
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9254 and AMD EPYC 7343 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9254 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7343 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
