 |
AMD EPYC 7573X vs AMD EPYC 7343 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7573X vs AMD EPYC 7343 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as 7zip, MATLAB, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, Blender, 3DMark, Prime95, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7343 or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7573X | 68% |
EPYC 7343 | 63% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7573X is 7% better than EPYC 7343. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7573X | 73% |
EPYC 7343 | 69% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 123.1 | | Valorant | 147.4 | 139.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 78.3 | | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 131.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 104.9 | | Overwatch | 119.4 | 113.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 96.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 69.9 | | Warzone | 115.0 | 109.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 117.5 | | Valheim | 122.4 | 116.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7573X | 19% |
EPYC 7343 | 24% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7343 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7573X since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 190W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 133 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 5605 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 251 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 11884 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 624 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 30909 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 1745 | 1409 | | Multi-Core | 60122 | 45341 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Single-Core | 1400 | 1387 | | Multi-Core | 40906 | 34378 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 7343 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 16 | | Threads | 64 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 190 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000506
100-000000506​WOF | 100-000000338
100-100000338WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7343 is 12% better than EPYC 7573X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7573X has 16 more core than EPYC 7343. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7343 is better: 3
However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7573X and AMD EPYC 7343 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7343 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
