MediaTek MT6595 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6595 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR G6200 and Mali-T830 MP3.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MT6595 or Exynos 7 Octa 7880 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595

22%

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

57%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Total score	50568	60634
CPU	14157	16971
GPU	19211	23044
MEM	8090	9701
UX	9092	10913

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Single-Core	130	156
Multi-Core	589	706

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Frequency	2200 MHz	1900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	8x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	1866
Memory bandwidth	6	16.5
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 13% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7880 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR G6200	Mali-T830 MP3
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	76.8	71.4
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	16.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	42.9	10.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.3	19.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.9	11.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.9	7.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	53.7	11.3
Real Racing 3	49.5	29.3
Sniper 3D	53.8	42.9
Need for Speed No Limits	50.9	31.2
Mortal Kombat X	45.3	28.3
CSR Racing 2	31.1	25.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	21.7 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.7 3CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	100 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is better: 18
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6595 and Exynos 7 Octa 7880, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6595 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6595 specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7880 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 7 Octa 7880 specs and review.