|
MediaTek MT6595 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6595 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, comparison of GPUs Adreno 508 and PowerVR G6200. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Snapdragon 630 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT6595 or Snapdragon 630 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6595 | 3% |
Snapdragon 630 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6595 | 22% |
Snapdragon 630 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6595 | 1% |
Snapdragon 630 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6595 |
Snapdragon 630 | Total score | 50568 | 66704 | CPU | 14157 | 18684 | GPU | 19211 | 25348 | MEM | 8090 | 10665 | UX | 9092 | 12001 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6595 |
Snapdragon 630 | Single-Core | 130 | 172 | Multi-Core | 589 | 776 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6595 |
Snapdragon 630 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 10.66 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR G6200 | Adreno 508 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 76.8 | 170 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 16.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 42.9 | 13.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 28.3 | 23.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.9 | 15.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.9 | 10.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 53.7 | 14.2 | Real Racing 3 | 49.5 | 40.6 | Sniper 3D | 53.8 | 30.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 50.9 | 32.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 45.3 | 33.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 31.1 | 32.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 is better: 22 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6595 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Snapdragon 630 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MT6750T • Vs MT6750 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|