MediaTek MT6739WA vs MediaTek MT6595

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6739WA vs MediaTek MT6595, compare of GPUs PowerVR G6200 and Mali-T860 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6739WA is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, Octane V2, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy MT6739WA or MT6595 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WA

MT6595

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WA

30%

MT6595

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WA

MT6595

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WA	MT6595
Total score	40143	50568
CPU	11242	14157
GPU	15253	19211
MEM	6420	8090
UX	7221	9092

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WA	MT6595
Single-Core	106	130
Multi-Core	490	589

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WA	MT6595
Frequency	1300 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	6	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 40% better than MT6739WA in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6739WA has 4 more core than MT6595. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T860 MP2	PowerVR G6200
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	54.31	76.8
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	12.2	16.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	32.1	42.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	21.7	28.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	18.2	25.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	27.8	35.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	41.5	53.7
Real Racing 3	27.1	49.5
Sniper 3D	34.7	53.8
Need for Speed No Limits	34.7	50.9
Mortal Kombat X	28.2	45.3
CSR Racing 2	28.2	31.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WA is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 26
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT6739WA and MT6595, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6739WA SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WA specs and review.

MT6595 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6595 specs and review.