MediaTek MT6753 vs MediaTek MT6595

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6753 vs MediaTek MT6595, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR G6200 and Mali-T720 MP3.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6753 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6753 or MT6595 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6753

MT6595

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6753

25%

MT6595

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6753

MT6595

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6753	MT6595
Total score	37157	50568
CPU	10397	14157
GPU	14113	19211
MEM	5954	8090
UX	6688	9092

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6753	MT6595
Single-Core	98	130
Multi-Core	454	589

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6753	MT6595
Frequency	1500 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 31% better than MT6753 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP3	PowerVR G6200
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	35.7	76.8
# of Cores	3	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.5	16.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	30.9	42.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.5	28.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.8	25.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	25.2	35.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	37.4	53.7
Real Racing 3	29.3	49.5
Sniper 3D	25.4	53.8
Need for Speed No Limits	35.1	50.9
Mortal Kombat X	28.3	45.3
CSR Racing 2	25.4	31.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6753 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 24
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6753 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6753 specs and review.

MT6595 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6595 specs and review.