Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6737V vs MediaTek MT6580 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6737V vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6737V vs MediaTek MT6580, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737V is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Quadrant, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6737V or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.


 
MediaTek MT6737V
MediaTek MT6580

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT6737V1% MT65801%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6737V30% MT658027%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT6737V1% MT65801%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6737V MT6580
Total score2652220999
CPU74265884
GPU100867987
MEM42423365
UX47753787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6737V MT6580
Single-Core7055
Multi-Core324256

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6737V MT6580
Frequency1250 MHz1500 MHz
Cores44
Bit6432
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2, LPDDR3LPDDR2
Max. Memory3 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency640266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 16% better than MT6737V in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720 MP2Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency600 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS20.48.4
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.66.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)19.517.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra11.711.2
Call of Duty: Mobile11.99.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.913.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition25.221.2
Real Racing 314.616.8
Sniper 3D22.221.3
Need for Speed No Limits21.113.4
Mortal Kombat X18.716.2
CSR Racing 212.913.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec support MPEG-4H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737V is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 4
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6737V SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


MT6737V SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


MT6580 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands