Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6735 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6735 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6735 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T628 MP6.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A15). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Octane V2, Geekbench, Neocore, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MT6735 or Exynos 5 Octa 5420 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

 
MediaTek MT6735
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT67352% Exynos 5 Octa 54202%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT673523% Exynos 5 Octa 542021%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT67351% Exynos 5 Octa 54201%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6735 Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Total score2790033608
CPU78139416
GPU1059712777
MEM44705370
UX50276058

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6735 Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Single-Core7489
Multi-Core341410

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6735 Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Frequency1500 MHz1900 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A15
4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR3 (Single Channel)LPDDR3
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency6671650
Memory bandwidth47
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache1 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is 21% better than MT6735 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6735 has 4 more core than Exynos 5 Octa 5420. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720 MP2Mali-T628 MP6
GPU Frequency600 MHz680 MHz
GFloPS20.4176
# of Cores26
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile7.89.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)21.726.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra13.917.6
Call of Duty: Mobile13.215.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)17.821.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition27.433.3
Real Racing 320.930.8
Sniper 3D26.438.7
Need for Speed No Limits2521.1
Mortal Kombat X22.222.9
CSR Racing 216.722.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3060
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.42 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.11 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is better: 31
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6735 and Exynos 5 Octa 5420, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


MT6735 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


Exynos 5 Octa 5420 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands