MediaTek MT6732M vs HiSilicon Kirin 620

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6732M vs HiSilicon Kirin 620, compare of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T760 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6732M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6732M or Kirin 620 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6732M

Kirin 620

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6732M

24%

Kirin 620

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6732M

Kirin 620

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6732M	Kirin 620
Total score	27277	33885
CPU	7632	9480
GPU	10363	12867
MEM	4359	5430
UX	4909	6089

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6732M	Kirin 620
Single-Core	72	90
Multi-Core	333	414

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6732M	Kirin 620
Frequency	1300 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	4	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6732M is 7% better than Kirin 620 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP2	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	34	29.81
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	7.6	11.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.6	28.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	13.1	19.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	13.4	17.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	17.7	23.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	27.5	35.4
Real Racing 3	22.9	38.2
Sniper 3D	28.8	24.8
Need for Speed No Limits	21	22.9
Mortal Kombat X	17	24.8
CSR Racing 2	15.7	24.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732M is better: 5
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6732M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6732M specs and review.

Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 620 specs and review.