MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6735M, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 and PowerVR SGX531.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT6735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, PCMark, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6575 or MT6735M and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

MT6735M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

MT6735M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

MT6735M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	MT6735M
Total score	10235	20157
CPU	2875	5642
GPU	3891	7668
MEM	1627	3232
UX	1834	3622

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	MT6735M
Single-Core	27	53
Multi-Core	125	246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	MT6735M
Frequency	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	1	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than MT6735M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-T720
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	7.65
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	4.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	15.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	9.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	7.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	11.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	19.1
Real Racing 3	7.2	18.4
Sniper 3D	5.8	20.2
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	12.9
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	12
CSR Racing 2	4.7	10.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735M is better: 31
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6575 and MT6735M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

MT6735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735M specs and review.