MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8312CW

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8312CW, compare of GPUs Mali-400 and PowerVR SGX531.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT8312CW is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MT6575 or MT8312CW and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

MT8312CW

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

MT8312CW

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

MT8312CW

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	MT8312CW
Total score	10235	12158
CPU	2875	3404
GPU	3891	4628
MEM	1627	1945
UX	1834	2178

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	MT8312CW
Single-Core	27	32
Multi-Core	125	148

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	MT8312CW
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	433
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312CW is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 1 more core than MT8312CW. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	3.6
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	1.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	8.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	4.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	3.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	5.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	10.1
Real Racing 3	7.2	7.7
Sniper 3D	5.8	8.4
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	6.2
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	5.7
CSR Racing 2	4.7	5.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312CW is better: 24
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

MT8312CW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312CW specs and review.