MediaTek MT6575 vs Intel Atom x3-C3200RK

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Intel Atom x3-C3200RK, comparison of GPUs PowerVR SGX531 and Mali-450 MP4.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Atom x3-C3200RK is quad-core (). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, PassMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MT6575 or Atom x3-C3200RK and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

Atom x3-C3200RK

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

Atom x3-C3200RK

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

Atom x3-C3200RK

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3200RK
Total score	10235	19384
CPU	2875	5426
GPU	3891	7356
MEM	1627	3101
UX	1834	3489

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3200RK
Single-Core	27	51
Multi-Core	125	236

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3200RK
Frequency	1000 MHz	1100 MHz
Cores	1	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	4x1.1 GHz
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2/3
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	1333
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x3-C3200RK is 9% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Atom x3-C3200RK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	35.77
# of Cores	1	4
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	6.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	16.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	10.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	9.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	13.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	20.5
Real Racing 3	7.2	15.8
Sniper 3D	5.8	16.8
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	14.7
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	13.7
CSR Racing 2	4.7	14.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3200RK is better: 35
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

Atom x3-C3200RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3200RK specs and review.