MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6570

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6570, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX531.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT6570 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MT6575 or MT6570 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

MT6570

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

MT6570

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

MT6570

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	MT6570
Total score	10235	12348
CPU	2875	3448
GPU	3891	4692
MEM	1627	1983
UX	1834	2214

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	MT6570
Single-Core	27	32
Multi-Core	125	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	MT6570
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6570 is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 1 more core than MT6570. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	960 x 540 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	3.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	10.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	6.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	5.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	7.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	12.3
Real Racing 3	7.2	9.8
Sniper 3D	5.8	14.3
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	11.7
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	7.5
CSR Racing 2	4.7	9.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6570 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6575 and MT6570, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

MT6570 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6570 specs and review.