MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8312

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8312, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR SGX531 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of chips in Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT6575 or MT8312 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

MT8312

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

MT8312

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

MT8312

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	MT8312
Total score	10235	12334
CPU	2875	3453
GPU	3891	4682
MEM	1627	1969
UX	1834	2228

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	MT8312
Single-Core	27	32
Multi-Core	125	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	MT8312
Frequency	1000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	433
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312 is 23% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 1 more core than MT8312. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	3.6
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	2.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	9.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	5.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	4.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	6.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	11.5
Real Racing 3	7.2	7.3
Sniper 3D	5.8	11
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	9.3
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	8.4
CSR Racing 2	4.7	7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312 specs and review.