|
MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC5735 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC5735, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX531. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Spreadtrum SC5735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MT6575 or Spreadtrum SC5735 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6575 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6575 | -4% |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | 24% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6575 | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6575 |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | Total score | 10235 | 19408 | CPU | 2875 | 5429 | GPU | 3891 | 7383 | MEM | 1627 | 3110 | UX | 1834 | 3485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6575 |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | Single-Core | 27 | 51 | Multi-Core | 125 | 237 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6575 |
Spreadtrum SC5735 | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 1 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9 | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 0.5 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC5735 is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Spreadtrum SC5735. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX531 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 216 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 2.24 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 840 x 480 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 1.8 | 5.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 7.5 | 15.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 3.6 | 9.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 3.1 | 8.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 5.9 | 12.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 9.1 | 19.3 | Real Racing 3 | 7.2 | 11.4 | Sniper 3D | 5.8 | 17.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 6.5 | 14.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 4.1 | 13.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 4.7 | 11.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 5 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | TD-SCDMA/GGE | Upload speed | | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC5735 is better: 30 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6575 and Spreadtrum SC5735, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6575 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M
Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
| |
|