Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC5735 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC5735

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Spreadtrum SC5735, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX531.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Spreadtrum SC5735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MT6575 or Spreadtrum SC5735 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

 
MediaTek MT6575
Spreadtrum SC5735

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT65751% Spreadtrum SC57351%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6575-4% Spreadtrum SC573524%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT65751% Spreadtrum SC57351%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6575 Spreadtrum SC5735
Total score1023519408
CPU28755429
GPU38917383
MEM16273110
UX18343485

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6575 Spreadtrum SC5735
Single-Core2751
Multi-Core125237

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6575 Spreadtrum SC5735
Frequency1000 MHz1200 MHz
Cores14
Bit3232
Lithography40 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A94x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory0.5 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency266266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC5735 is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Spreadtrum SC5735. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR SGX531Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency216 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS2.248.4
# of Cores12
# of Shader Units
Display840 x 480 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile1.85.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)7.515.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra3.69.1
Call of Duty: Mobile3.18.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)5.912.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition9.119.3
Real Racing 37.211.4
Sniper 3D5.817.3
Need for Speed No Limits6.514.6
Mortal Kombat X4.113.2
CSR Racing 24.711.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution5 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemTD-SCDMA/GGE
Upload speed
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC5735 is better: 30
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6575 and Spreadtrum SC5735, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT6575 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M


Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands